Home > News & Blogs > Worst Car Backseats: Models with Uncomfortable Rear Seating
Worst Car Backseats: Models with Uncomfortable Rear Seating
7 Cars With the Worst Backseats (And Better Alternatives)
When shopping for a car, many buyers focus on driver comfort and styling while neglecting a crucial factor: backseat space. This oversight becomes painfully apparent when passengers squeeze into cramped rear quarters never designed for adult comfort. While sports cars and two-door models get a pass for limited rear space, some surprisingly popular vehicles offer shockingly poor backseat accommodations.
At MotorVero, we've identified seven models that fail the passenger comfort test. Our comprehensive review examines each vehicle's shortcomings and suggests superior alternatives with comparable pricing but far better rear-seat accommodations.
What Makes a Bad Backseat?
Several factors contribute to poor rear-seat comfort:
- Limited legroom: Less than 34 inches makes adult comfort impossible
- Low seating position: Forces passengers into uncomfortable knee-raised positions
- Excessive floor humps: Reduces foot space for center passengers
- Poor seat design: Thin cushions or awkward angles cause discomfort
- Restricted headroom: Tall passengers constantly duck
- Bad entry/exit: Difficult access compounds space issues
- --TOP ADVERTISEMENT HERE--
Key Measurements for Backseat Comfort
- Excellent: 38+ inches of legroom
- Good: 35-37 inches of legroom
- Marginal: 33-34 inches of legroom
- Poor: Under 33 inches of legroom
The Worst Offenders for Backseat Comfort
Chevrolet Malibu (2018 Models)
While the Malibu presents itself as a comfortable midsize sedan, its rear accommodations tell a different story. With just 36.8 inches of rear legroom (2.1 inches less than a Toyota Camry), the Malibu's backseat fails to meet class standards.
Key Problems:
- Exceptionally low seating position forces awkward knee angles
- Prominent floor hump reduces foot space
- Short seat cushions provide poor thigh support
- Narrow width limits three-across comfort
-
Better Alternative: The Honda Accord offers 40.4 inches of rear legroom with superior seat design and cushioning. The Volkswagen Passat provides an even more generous 39.1 inches with available reclining rear seats.
Ford Fiesta (2012 Models)
The Fiesta's 31.2 inches of rear legroom places it at the bottom of the subcompact class. What makes this particularly disappointing is that several competitors in the same price range offer far better accommodations.
Key Problems:
- Knees press firmly against front seatbacks
- Minimal headroom for taller passengers
- Cramped footwells with intrusive center hump
- Claustrophobic feel due to high beltline
- --FIRST CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--
Better Alternative: The Nissan Versa provides a class-leading 37.4 inches of rear legroom - over 6 inches more than the Fiesta. The Honda Fit offers 39.3 inches in a more versatile package.
Hyundai Tucson (2012 Models)
While the Tucson's specifications suggest competitive rear space, real-world comfort falls short of segment leaders. The fixed rear seat position and low mounting create discomfort on longer trips.
Key Problems:
- Non-adjustable seat limits comfort options
- Low seating position creates "knees up" posture
- Aggressive downward door frame complicates entry/exit
- Firm suspension transmits bumps to rear passengers
-
Better Alternative: The Honda CR-V provides 40.4 inches of legroom with available rear seat adjustment. The Subaru Forester offers 39.4 inches with superior visibility and comfort.
Jeep Wrangler Unlimited
The four-door Wrangler's extended wheelbase promised improved passenger space, but most benefits went to cargo capacity rather than rear seat comfort.
Key Problems:
- Only 1.6 inches more legroom than two-door model
- Short seat cushions lack thigh support
- Upright seating position creates fatigue
- Excessive road noise at highway speeds
- --SECOND CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--
Better Alternative: The Jeep Grand Cherokee provides 38.6 inches of rear legroom in a more comfortable package. For serious off-road capability with better comfort, consider the Toyota 4Runner (32.9 inches).
Lexus IS Sedan
This luxury sports sedan sacrifices rear space for styling, resulting in one of the tightest backseats in its class at just 30.6 inches of legroom.
Key Problems:
- Less rear legroom than economy cars
- Extremely low seating position
- Massive transmission tunnel compromises center position
- Limited headroom due to sloping roofline
- --FOURTH CAR LIST HERE--
Better Alternative: The Lexus ES provides 39.2 inches of rear legroom. For sporty luxury with space, the Acura TLX offers 38.5 inches with available rear seat heating.
Mazda3 Sedan
While the Mazda3's 36.2 inches of claimed rear legroom sounds competitive, packaging inefficiencies make it feel significantly tighter than the numbers suggest.
Key Problems:
- Front seatbacks intrude into knee space
- Narrow footwells limit positioning options
- High beltline creates closed-in feeling
- Firm suspension affects ride comfort
- --THIRD CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--
Better Alternative: The Honda Civic provides 37.4 inches of more usable rear legroom. The Kia Forte offers 35.7 inches in a more comfortable package.
Toyota FJ Cruiser
The FJ Cruiser's unconventional design creates numerous rear seat challenges despite its substantial exterior dimensions.
Key Problems:
- Clamshell doors complicate child seat installation
- Massive C-pillars block outward visibility
- Upright seating position becomes tiring
- Limited legroom despite large exterior
- --FIFTH CAR LIST HERE--
Better Alternative: The Toyota Highlander provides 38.4 inches of rear legroom. For off-road capability with comfort, consider the Land Rover Discovery Sport (35.1 inches).
How to Test Backseat Comfort When Shopping
When evaluating a vehicle's rear seat accommodations:
- Bring your tallest family member to test headroom
- Have the driver position the front seat for their comfort first
- Attempt to sit behind the driver's position
- Note knee clearance and footwell space
- Assess ease of entry and exit
- Check visibility from rear seats
- Spend at least 10 minutes sitting to evaluate comfort
Backseat Comfort Checklist
- At least 3 fingers of knee clearance
- Head shouldn't touch headliner
- Feet should lay flat on floor
- Seat cushion should support thighs
- Doors should open wide for easy access
Frequently Asked Questions
Which car class typically has the worst backseats?
Subcompact cars and sporty coupes naturally have the least rear space, but some surprising offenders exist in midsize sedan and SUV segments where buyers expect better accommodations.
Can aftermarket modifications improve backseat comfort?
While seat cushion upgrades can help marginally, fundamental space limitations can't be overcome. Vehicles with poor legroom measurements will always feel cramped.
--BOTTOM ADVERTISEMENT HERE--
How important is backseat space if I rarely carry passengers?
Even occasional use matters - resale value suffers on vehicles with notoriously poor rear accommodations. Future needs may also change with growing families or carpool requirements.
Do electric vehicles have better backseat space?
Many EVs benefit from flat floors and optimized packaging, but some (like Tesla Model 3) sacrifice rear comfort for styling. Always test before assuming.
Final Recommendations
When evaluating any vehicle, prioritize backseat testing with actual passengers rather than relying solely on specifications. The difference between claimed measurements and real-world comfort can be substantial, as shown by our seven featured offenders. For buyers who regularly transport adults or older children, compromising on rear accommodations leads to long-term dissatisfaction.
At MotorVero, we recommend cross-shopping any vehicle with poor rear seat reviews against segment leaders before making a final decision. The comfort of your passengers - and your resale value - will thank you.
--SIXTH CAR LIST HERE--

Motorvero G-queen
Last Updated On Apr, 12-2025