Home > News & Blogs > 2016 V-8 Muscle Car Showdown: Comparing Performance & Power

2016 V-8 Muscle Car Showdown: Comparing Performance & Power

Ultimate V8 Muscle Car Showdown: Challenger vs Camaro vs Mustang | MotorVero

The Ultimate V8 Muscle Car Showdown

V8 muscle cars


In the realm of American performance cars, few rivalries spark as much passion as the battle between modern V8-powered muscle cars. The segment offers an unprecedented combination of power and value, with nearly 500 horsepower available for around $40,000. This comprehensive comparison pits three legendary contenders against each other: the Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack, Chevrolet Camaro 2SS, and Ford Mustang GT.

2024 Jaguar I-PACE Image
2024 Jaguar I-PACE

$81853

electric

0 mi

Good Deal   Good

0 (5)

2022 Lexus ES 350 Image
2022 Lexus ES 350

$36888

Gas

25516 mi

Very Good Deal   Very Good

0 (5)

Audi e-tron 50 Quattro Image
Audi e-tron 50 Quattro

$119680

electric

10000 mi

Good Deal   Good

0 (5)


Key Performance Specifications

  • Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack: 485 hp, 6.4L HEMI V8
  • Chevrolet Camaro 2SS: 455 hp, 6.2L LT1 V8
  • Ford Mustang GT: 435 hp, 5.0L Coyote V8

Performance Testing Methodology

To objectively compare these modern muscle cars, we conducted rigorous testing at a professional motorsports park, evaluating:

  • Straight-line acceleration (0-60 mph and quarter-mile times)
  • Braking performance (60-0 mph distances)
  • Road course handling characteristics
  • Driver engagement and overall driving experience

All vehicles were equipped with six-speed manual transmissions to maintain consistency in testing conditions. Professional drivers and automotive journalists provided subjective evaluations to complement the quantitative data.

--TOP ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Acceleration: Power Meets Physics

While horsepower numbers tell part of the story, power-to-weight ratios ultimately determine acceleration performance. The Challenger's 485-hp HEMI V8 leads in raw output, but the Camaro's significantly lighter chassis (555 lbs less than the Challenger) gives it a decisive advantage.

Chevrolet Camaro 2SS

  • 0-60 mph: 4.3 seconds
  • Quarter-mile: 12.3 seconds @ 114.3 mph
  • Power-to-weight: 8.9 lbs/hp

The Camaro's all-new Alpha platform delivered exceptional traction, allowing aggressive 4,000 rpm launches without significant wheelspin. The 6.2-liter LT1 V8 provided immediate torque response from low RPMs, building linearly to redline.

2016 Buick Cascada Image
2016 Buick Cascada

$12243

Gas

77700 mi

Good Deal   Good

1 (5)

2016 Audi A4 Allroad Image
2016 Audi A4 Allroad

$11765

Gas

98864 mi

Very Good Deal   Very Good

0 (5)

2023 Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron Image
2023 Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron

$39651

electric

14310 mi

Good Deal   Good

0 (5)


Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack

  • 0-60 mph: 4.8 seconds
  • Quarter-mile: 12.9 seconds @ 111.6 mph
  • Power-to-weight: 9.5 lbs/hp

The Challenger's massive torque overwhelmed its 245mm rear tires at every gear change. Test drivers noted the manual transmission's heavy clutch and long throws made quick shifts challenging. Despite the power advantage, weight hampered acceleration.

Ford Mustang GT

  • 0-60 mph: 4.7 seconds
  • Quarter-mile: 13.2 seconds @ 111.3 mph
  • Power-to-weight: 9.1 lbs/hp

The Mustang exhibited unexpected power delivery issues during testing, with an unexplained 4,000 rpm wall during hard launches. Combined with pronounced wheel hop, these factors prevented the Mustang from achieving its full potential.

Braking Performance Analysis

All three vehicles featured Brembo brake systems, but implementation differences resulted in varying performance:

--FIRST CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Stopping Distance Comparison

  • Camaro 2SS: 116.2 feet (60-0 mph)
  • Mustang GT: 119.1 feet
  • Challenger R/T Scat Pack: 121.6 feet

The Camaro's four-piston Brembo calipers and optimized weight distribution provided the most consistent stops, though some testers noted longer-than-expected pedal travel. The Mustang's brakes transitioned from street to track exceptionally well, while the Challenger's ABS worked overtime to compensate for its weight and narrower tires.

Road Course Handling Evaluation

The 1.2-mile road course revealed each car's true dynamic character beyond straight-line performance:

Camaro 2SS: The Precision Instrument

The Camaro's new lightweight chassis proved remarkably capable, with exceptional cornering grip and balanced weight distribution. Test drivers could carry more speed through turns and apply power earlier on exit. The electrically assisted steering provided excellent feedback, though visibility issues (common to all current-generation Camaros) presented challenges on track.

2016 Buick Cascada Image
2016 Buick Cascada

$12243

Gas

77700 mi

Good Deal   Good

1 (5)

2016 Audi A4 Allroad Image
2016 Audi A4 Allroad

$11765

Gas

98864 mi

Very Good Deal   Very Good

0 (5)

2023 Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron Image
2023 Audi Q4 Sportback e-tron

$39651

electric

14310 mi

Good Deal   Good

0 (5)


Mustang GT: The Playful Performer

While not as technically precise as the Camaro, the Mustang GT with Performance Package delivered the most engaging driving experience. The rear axle willingly stepped out under power but remained easily controllable. Ford's steering calibration continues to set benchmarks for feedback and response.

Challenger R/T Scat Pack: The Surprising Contender

For its substantial size and weight, the Challenger performed admirably on track. The 3.90 rear axle ratio helped acceleration out of corners, though frequent gear changes highlighted the manual transmission's limitations. Drivers noted the car required more steering input and patience when transitioning between turns.

Driver Engagement and Daily Usability

Beyond lap times, these cars deliver distinct ownership experiences:

Interior and Comfort

The Challenger offers the most spacious cabin and best outward visibility, along with retro-styled interior elements. The Camaro's cockpit feels most driver-focused but suffers from thick roof pillars and high window sills. The Mustang strikes a balance between sportiness and comfort.

--SECOND CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Exhaust Note and Presence

Sound quality varied significantly:

  • Camaro's dual-mode exhaust delivers aggressive crackles on overrun
  • Challenger's active exhaust produces classic muscle car wail
  • Mustang's factory mufflers were criticized as too subdued

Technical Specifications Deep Dive

2016 Camaro 2SS

2016 Camaro 2SS

  • Engine: 6.2L LT1 V8 (455 hp @ 6000 rpm, 455 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm)
  • Transmission: 6-speed manual (TR6060)
  • Curb Weight: 3,685 lbs
  • Suspension: MacPherson strut front, multi-link rear
  • Tires: 245/40ZR20 front, 275/35ZR20 rear

2016 Mustang GT

2016 Mustang GT

  • Engine: 5.0L Coyote V8 (435 hp @ 6500 rpm, 400 lb-ft @ 4250 rpm)
  • Transmission: 6-speed manual (MT82)
  • Curb Weight: 3,705 lbs (with Performance Pack)
  • Suspension: Independent front and rear
  • Tires: 255/40ZR19 (Performance Pack)
  • --FOURTH CAR LIST HERE--

2016 Challenger R/T Scat Pack

2016 Challenger R/T Scat Pack

  • Engine: 6.4L HEMI V8 (485 hp @ 6100 rpm, 475 lb-ft @ 4100 rpm)
  • Transmission: 6-speed manual (Tremec TR6060)
  • Curb Weight: 4,240 lbs
  • Suspension: Five-link rear, independent front
  • Tires: 245/45ZR20 all around

Final Verdict: Choosing Your Muscle Car

Each of these modern muscle cars delivers exceptional performance with distinct personalities:

For Pure Performance: Chevrolet Camaro 2SS

The lightest, most capable chassis with the best power-to-weight ratio. Ideal for drivers prioritizing lap times and technical driving.

For Daily Driving Comfort: Dodge Challenger R/T Scat Pack

Spacious interior, classic styling, and effortless torque make it the best grand tourer of the trio.

--THIRD CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

For Driving Enjoyment: Ford Mustang GT

Balanced handling and playful rear axle deliver the most smiles per mile, despite some technical shortcomings.

Ultimately, all three represent the pinnacle of affordable American performance, each excelling in different aspects of the muscle car experience. Your personal priorities—whether raw speed, daily usability, or driver engagement—will determine which of these exceptional machines best fits your needs.

--FIFTH CAR LIST HERE--

proImg

Motorvero G-queen

Last Updated On Apr, 12-2025

Share Now: